LOGIN

RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube
GLOSSARY       

SEARCHGLOSSARY

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

PROFILESEARCH

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





 

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Are Kissing Gourami Specialized for Substrate-Feeding? Prey Capture Kinematics of Helostoma temminckii and Other Anabantoid Fishes
October 4, 2012
8:13 am
Avatar
Matt
Málaga, Spain
Admin
Forum Posts: 8239
Member Since:
June 13, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ferry et al. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology - early view

Abstract

Helostoma temminckii are known for a “kissing” behavior, which is often used in intraspecific interactions, and an unusual cranial morphology that is characterized by an intramandibular joint (IMJ). The IMJ is located within the lower jaw and aids in generating the eponymous kissing movement. In other teleost linages the IMJ is associated with the adoption of a substrate-grazing foraging habit. However, because of anatomical modifications of the gill-rakers, Helostoma has been considered a midwater filter-feeding species. We offered midwater, benthic, and attached food to HelostomaBetta, and two “true” osphronemid gouramis, to ask: (1) how do food capture kinematics differ in different foraging contexts; and (2) are Helostoma feeding kinematics distinct when compared with closely related anabantoids that lack an IMJ? For all anabantoid species except Helostoma, benthic prey were captured using a greater contribution of effective suction relative to midwater prey, though Helostoma was rarely willing to feed in the midwater. Helostoma individuals produced relatively less suction than other species regardless of the food type. Helostoma produced a much larger gape and more premaxillary protrusion than other species, but also took longer to do so. We suggest that the jaw morphology of Helostoma facilitates an extremely large mouth-gape to enhance substrate-scraping. The large amplitude mouth-opening that characterizes substrate-feeding may represent a functional trade-off, whereby the enhanced ability to procure food from the substrate is accompanied by a concomitant reduction in the ability to produce suction. J. Exp. Zool.

 

 
Cake or death?
Forum Timezone: Europe/Paris

Most Users Ever Online: 246

Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Devices in use: Desktop (1)

Top Posters:

Stefan: 1567

Plaamoo: 1253

mikev: 1134

Malti: 1099

Mark Duffill: 1012

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 30289

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 10

Topics: 4595

Posts: 36615

Newest Members: adennett, Brawny, qchris87, grayergroove, bhisma wildan

Administrators: dunc: 1323, Matt: 8239