LOGIN

RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube
GLOSSARY       

SEARCHGLOSSARY

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

PROFILESEARCH

Molecular phylogenetic relationships of pangasiid and schilbid catfishes in Thailand

Home Forums Ichthyology Molecular phylogenetic relationships of pangasiid and schilbid catfishes in Thailand

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Matt 5 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #302229

    Matt
    Keymaster

    Abstract

    In this study, the phylogenetic relationships among 13 pangasiids and six schilbids of Thailand were reconstructed based on the almost complete mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b), 12S rRNA, tRNA-Val and 16S rRNA, as well as the partial nuclear recombination-activating gene 1 (rag1) sequences by using the maximum likelihood and the Bayesian inference methods of phylogenetic reconstruction. The reconstructed phylogeny based on the concatenated sequence data set recovered Pangasiidae and Schilbidae as reciprocally monophyletic groups. Within Pangasiidae, four major clades were recovered, which according to the cyt b genetic distances can be categorized into four genera: PangasiusPseudolaisHelicophagus and Pangasianodon. The genus Pangasianodon was strongly supported as the most basal taxon within pangasiids, whereas Pseudolais + Helicophagus were recovered as a sister group ofPangasius. Within the latter, the giant pangasius Pangasius sanitwongsei was recovered as a sister group of the spot pangasiusPangasius larnaudiiPangasius krempfi as a sister group of Pangasius nasutus + Pangasius conchophilus and Pangasius polyuranodonas a sister species of Pangasius macronema. Other internal phylogenetic relationships, however, were unresolved. Within Schilbidae,Pseudeutropius was supported as the most basal lineage. Eutropiichthys was recovered as a sister group of Clupisoma. The enigmaticClupisoma sinense was recognized as more closely related to Laides longibarbis than to Clupisoma prateri. Thus, based on the cyt bgenetic distances, a recategorization of C. sinense to the genus Laides is suggested. On the basis of a relaxed clock fossil calibration, the divergence of pangasiids and schilbids was estimated to have occurred 14·93 million years before present (b.p.) during the Miocene epoch. The separation between Pangasiidae and Schilbidae took place c. 13·12 Mb.p. during the early middle Miocene. The estimated divergence time of pangasiids is similar to the age of the calibrated fossil, Cetopangasius chaetobranchus, which was discovered in north-central Thailand. This suggests that the oldest pangasiid ancestor diverged into diverse genera in the area.

     

    Journal of Fish Biology, early view.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.