Xiphostoma hujeta Valenciennes, 1850; Luciocharax insculptus Steindachner, 1878
Ctenolucius: from a combing form of the Greek kteno-, meaning ‘comb, comb-shaped’, plus the specific name lucius in reference to Esox lucius, the northern pike.
It’s natural range extends west from the Lake Maracaibo basin of northwestern Venezuela via the Río Magdalena drainage in northern Colombia as far as the Río Sinú in the northwest of the latter country.
Type locality is ‘Rivers of Lake Maracaibo basin, Venezuela’.
At least one report states it shows a preference for calmer waters which would appear to be corroborated by more-detailed observations of C. beani which is said to form loose aggregations of 2-5 adult individuals in still pools.
The ‘flaps’ formed by modified lip membranes seen in our images above are used as accessory breathing apparatus in oxygen-deficient conditions so many of its habitats are likely subject to seasonal changes.
Maximum Standard Length
200 – 250 mm – reports elsewhere stating a much larger adult size are erroneous.
Aquarium SizeTop ↑
Water depth is less important but should not be less than 30 cm.
Other décor is relatively unimportant but can consist of a sandy substrate with leaf litter plus some large driftwood branches and twisted roots.
Plants which can grow rooted in sand can also be added as can those which grow attached to solid surfaces such as Microsorum, Taxiphyllum or Anubias spp.
Lighting can simply be tailored to the plants being used.
If using a deeper tank you could fill it to 50-70% of capacity and add emergent branches and plants which can look very effective.
A tightly-fitting cover should be used in all cases as ctenoluciids are generally excellent jumpers.
Efficient filtration is a must when keeping predatory species due to the amount of waste produced so install one or more external canister filters and/or a sump system, organising the return in such a way that turbulent flow is avoided.
Weekly water changes of 30-50% should be considered mandatory as this species can be sensitive to organic pollutants and swings in water chemistry, and for this reason it must never be introduced to biologically immature set-ups.
Temperature: 22 – 28 °C
pH: 5.0 – 7.5
Hardness: 18 – 268 ppm
Smaller specimens can be offered bloodworm, small earthworms, chopped prawn and suchlike while adults will accept strips of fish flesh, whole prawns/shrimp, mussels, live river shrimp, larger earthworms, etc.
Insects such as crickets or are also suitable to use although it’s best to fill the stomachs of these by feeding them fish flakes or some kind of vegetable matter before offering them to the fish.
Take care not to overfeed as it will gorge itself given the opportunity.
Some of the lipids contained in these cannot be properly metabolised by the fish and can cause excess fat deposits and even organ degeneration.
Similarly there is no benefit in the use of ‘feeder’ fish such as livebearers or small goldfish which carry with them the risk of parasite or disease introduction and at any rate tend not have a high nutritional value unless properly conditioned beforehand.
Behaviour and CompatibilityTop ↑
Surprisingly peaceful with anything too large to swallow and can be maintained in a community provided tankmates are chosen with care.
Aggressively territorial or very competitive species should be avoided with the best choices being placid fishes which feed from the substrate such as Geophagus spp., Acarichthys heckelii, medium-sized doradid or loricariid catfishes and characids from genera like Hemiodus, Mylossoma or Myloplus, and we’ve even seen it maintained successfully alongside discus.
Other surface-dwellers are best avoided although some hobbyists report success keeping it alongside the related Acestrorhynchus spp.
Older individuals tend to be more solitary but still group together from time-to-time, and it’s best maintained in numbers of four or more.
Sexually mature females tend to be a little larger and rounder-bodied than males.
Very little information exists though this is likely to be as much a result of lack of effort than any great difficulty in inducing the fish to spawn.
The most detailed account to date was published in a German hobbyists’ magazine in 1982 of which brief details were reproduced in Baensch and Riehl (1985).
Spawning itself occurs at the water surface with a pair swimming in parallel and at the climax raising the posterior third of their bodies above the water surface, the male clasping the genital papilla of the female in his anal-fin.
At this point eggs and milt are released and the process repeated every few minutes for up to three hours.
The eggs numbered over 1000 and hatched after 20 hours at 80.6°F/27°C, with the fry free swimming at 60 hours.
C. hujeta is traded under various names including ‘slant-nosed gar’, ‘hujeta gar’, ‘rocket gar’ and ‘freshwater barracuda’ but it and other members of the family Ctenoluciidae have traditionally been referred to as ‘pike characids’.
The two groupings are relatively simple to tell apart with Ctenolucius differing from Boulengerella in several synapomorphic characters including: possession of 45-50 lateral line scales (vs. 87-124); scales with distinct posterior serrations (vs. absence); possession of flattened ‘flaps’ on either side of the lower jaw (vs. absence); absence of fleshy appendage at tip of snout (vs. presence); first 4-5 teeth in upper jaw noticeably larger than other teeth (vs. teeth uniformly-sized).
C. hujeta is distinguished from its only congener C. beani by lacking thin, dark lateral stripes on the body in specimens larger than 100 mm SL although Vari (1995) noted that some aberrant individuals from the lower Río Magdalena do have body stripes which are actually better-developed than those in C. beani.
Within the order Characiformes the family Ctenoluciidae is also distinguished by a set of synapomorphic characters as follows: tapering body shape; elongate jaw shape; possession of many small teeth with curved tips arranged in a single series within each jaw.
A further limiting factor has been that in many cases exhaustive study of these on an individual basis is the only way to resolve such problems.
Modern molecular phylogenetic techniques have allowed some headway, though, and research published by Calcagnotto et al. (2005) revealed some interesting hypotheses.
Others such as Oliveira et al. (2011) have concluded that the family Erythrinidae is also closely-related to this grouping with Hepsetidae and Alestidae more distant.
- Cuvier, G., and A. Valenciennes, 1850 - Histoire naturelle des poissons v. 22: i-xx + 1 p. + 1-532 + 1-91
Histoire naturelle des poissons. Tome vingt-deuxième. Suite du livre vingt-deuxième. Suite de la famille des Salmonoïdes. Table générale de l'Histoire Naturelle des Poissons (pp. 1-91).
- Baensch, H. A. and R. Riehl, 1985 - Mergus, Verlag für Natur- und Heimtierkunde GmbH, Melle, Germany: 1-1216
Aquarien atlas. Band 2.
- Calcagnotto, D., S. A. Schaefer and R. De Salle, 2005 - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36(1): 135-153
Relationships among characiform fishes inferred from analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences.
- Oliveira, C. A., G. S. Avellino, K. T. Abe, T. C. Mariguela, R. C. Benine, G. Orti, R. P. Vari, and R. M. Corrêa e Castro, 2011 - BMC Evolutionary Biology 11(1): 275-300
Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling.
- Reis, R. E., S. O. Kullander and C. J. Ferraris, Jr. (eds.), 2003 - EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre: i-xi + 1-729
Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. CLOFFSCA.
- Vari, R. P., 1995 - Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 564: 1-97
The Neotropical fish family Ctenoluciidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes): supra and intrafamilial phylogenetic relationships, with a revisionary study.