Native to southern India with the type series originating from the Tunga River at Shimoga in Karnataka (previously Mysore) state. The Tunga is part of the Upper Krishna River drainage and arises from a hill known as Varaha Parvata in the Western Ghats mountain range.
It flows northeastwards, through the districts of Chikkamagaluru and Shimoga, before emptying into the Bhadra River from which point it’s known as the Tungabhadra until it enters the Krishna in Andhra Pradesh state.
A 2008 fish diversity survey of the Bhadra failed to record G. bicornuta at any locality other than its confluence with the Tunga, suggesting this might represent the lower limit of its range. It may occur in other parts of the Krishna basin but we’ve been unable to find any definitive references.
Neither origin nor accuracy of reported occurences in Kolhapur District, Maharashtra state van be confirmed, either, and it’s possibly endemic to the Tunga.
Southern India is heavily affected by the summer monsoons meaning that many, possibly all, of the species‘ habitats are subjected to subject to seasonal variations in flow/partial drying. The Tunga winds its course through a series of valleys and hills covered by semi-deciduous forest or bamboo, and unlike the heavily-polluted Tungabhadra is noted for the purity of its water.
Korkanhalla stream is the type locality of Psilorhynchus tenura Arunachalam and Muralidharan, 2008, and an upper tributary of the Tunga flowing through Khudremukh National Park at around 650 m AMSL. It has a mixed gravel/cobble susbstrate and G. bicornuta was also recorded there with sympatric species including Parambassis ranga, Garra mullya, Barilius canarensis, Osteochilichthys nashii, Dawkinsia arulius, Puntius sahyadriensis (though the stream is outside the distribution range normally quoted for this species), Rasbora daniconius, Salmophasia boopis, Botia striata, Balitora mysorensis, Schistura semiarmata, Glyptothorax madraspatanum and Mystus keletius.
Maximum Standard Length
120 – 150mm.
Aquarium SizeTop ↑
Not difficult to keep in a well-maintained set-up, though we recommend aquascaping the tank to resemble a flowing stream/river with a substrate of variably-sized, water-worn rocks, sand, fine gravel and perhaps some small boulders.
This can be further furnished with driftwood roots or branches, and while the majority of aquatic plants will fail to thrive in such surroundings hardy types such as Microsorum, Bolbitis or Anubias spp. can be grown attached to the décor.
Most importantly the water must be clean and well-oxygenated so we suggest the use of an over-sized filter as a minimum requirement. Turnover should ideally be in excess of 20 times per hour so additional powerheads/airstones should be employed to achieve the desired flow and oxygenation if necessary. Bright lighting will promote the growth of a biofilm upon which the fish will graze.
Since it needs stable water conditions and feeds on biofilm this species should never be added to a biologically immature set-up and a tightly-fitting cover is necessary since it can literally climb glass. While regular partial water changes are essential aufwuchs can be allowed to grow on all surfaces except perhaps the viewing pane.
Temperature: 22 – 27 °C
pH: 6.0 – 8.0
Hardness: 36 – 215 ppm
Although it will graze algae if available this species is not an exclusive herbivore. Offer meaty foods such as live or frozen bloodworm, Tubifex, Artemia, chopped prawn, etc., along with good quality, sinking dried products, at least some of which should contain a significant proportion of vegetable matter such as Spirulina or similar.
Fresh fruit and vegetables such as cucumber, melon, blanched spinach or courgette can be offered occasionally and home-made, gelatine-bound recipes containing a mixture of dried fish food, puréed shellfish, fresh fruit and vegetables, for example, are also proven to work well.
Behaviour and CompatibilityTop ↑
Can be territorial at times, especially when food is added to the tank, and will often actively pursue other fishes straying into the vicinity. This behaviour tends to vary even within individuals so we suspect it may form temporary territories based on food availability in nature.
At any rate this means the most suitable tankmates are active, peaceful cyprinids since they’re normally agile enough to avoid such attacks. Slow-moving/long-finned species should be omitted in the majority of circumstances.
In terms of bottom-dwellers, similarly-shaped fishes such as other Garra, Crossocheilus or Epalzeorhynchos are likely to prove incompatible in all but the largest set-ups, though more robust members of Botia, Sinibotia, and Yasuhikotakia should work ok. Species from the families Balitoridae and Nemacheildae are generally ignored in our experience but as always when selecting a fish community proper research is essential.
A set-up based around fish from the Western Ghats would also make an interesting project with possibilities including Dawksinia arulius, D. filamentosus, D. tambraparniei, Barilius bakeri, B. canarensis, Devario malabaricus, Schistura denisonii, Nemachilichthys shimogensis, and Mesonoemacheilus triangularis.
It isn’t particularly tolerant of conspecifics but normally exists in loose aggregations in the wild. If kept singly it tends to behave more aggressively with similarly-shaped fishes so we recommend the purchase of 3-4 or more should space permit.
Such a group will develop a noticeable pecking order between themselves but tankmates are more likely to be left alone. What appear to be hierarchical disputes will sometimes occur and involve charging, flaring of fins and an overall paling of the body colouration.
The reproductive biology of Garra spp. is poorly-studied and captive breeding of any species a rare occurrence. A 2005 study of G. gotyla in Nepal concluded that the fish spawn throughout the monsoon season and appear migratory to some extent, i.e, they swim upstream before depositing their eggs.
G. rufa is produced in commercial quantities for health spas without the use of hormones and G. flavatra and G. ceylonensis have both been bred using natural methods.
The latter is an endangered Sri Lankan endemic and was the subject of a 2005 study designed to determine an appropriate means of artificial reproduction for conservation purposes. The adults were conditioned in groups before reverse trios consisting of a single female and two males were isolated in smaller (60 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm) tanks.
Spawning was initiated by switching off the aeration and the adults removed once eggs were spotted. The only courtship behaviour observed was intense chasing and the spawning tanks had to be covered in order to prevent the fish jumping out.
Eggs hatched in 36-48 hours at 26-28°C and the yolk sac was absorbed within 4 days. The larvae were found not to possess an adhesive disc and initially swam freely in the water column. Disc development took between 60-64 days and once fully-formed the fry began to assume a more benthic lifestyle.
G. flavatra is currently being bred for the aquatic trade. In this case adult pairs are separated into smaller tanks containing highly-oxygenated, running water. The fry are first fed an egg yolk suspension until big enough to handle Artemia nauplii.
This species is among the more colourful members of the genus and is also traded as ‘Tunga garra’, ‘lionhead garra’, Garra sp. ‘rhinoceros’ and ‘doctor fish’ (it’s supposedly used as a substitute for G. rufa in some Malaysian health spas).
It’s the only member of the genus known to possess a pair of rostral processes (referred to as the ‘secondary rostrum‘ when taken together), and can further be told apart from similar-looking species such as G. fuliginosa or G.gotyla stenorhynchus as it has only a single pair of barbels whereas the others all have two. The other main identifying feature is the blue opercular spot which is uniquely ringed with gold blotches.
The preciose function of the secondary rostrum remains unknown; some have suggested it may have some hydro-mechanical purpose but it’s perhaps more likely related to reproductiion and/or social interactions. Only males develop prominent rostra, more so in alpha (dominant) individuals. The ‘horns’ are also flexible to a certain degree and held erect when the fish are excited, for example during bouts of sparring or territorial aggression.
The genus is a particularly enigmatic grouping with new taxa described on a regular basis, while many of the existing ones may represent cases of misidentification or synonyms of other species. To confuse matters further some of the revisions have also been called into question.
A full generic review would be ideal but is unlikely to materialise given the extensive distribution of its members which range from southern China across much of southeast Asia, India and the Middle East as far as north/central Africa.
Instead a number of less-extensive works published in recent years have resulted in a gradual, but continuing, improvement in knowledge, and it remains possible that the genus may be broken up into smaller taxa since the current grouping appears to be polyphyletic.
Garra species are usually included in the subfamily Labeoninae/Cyprininae (name varies with author) which by current thinking is further divided into several tribes and subtribes (Stiassny and Getahun, 2007). The putatively monophyletic subtribe Garraina comprises Garra plus numerous other genera including the well-known Crossocheilus and Epalzeorhynchos.
Within this division their closest relatives are members of Discogobio, Discocheilus and Placocheilus (the latter pair are regarded as junior synonyms of Garra by some authors, e.g., Kottelat), all of which share some significant morphological characters.
The most prominent of these is a lower lip modified to form a mental adhesive disc, allowing the fish to cling to surfaces in turbulent conditions. Results obtained in a phylogenetic study of Chinese species belonging to this so-called ‘disc-bearing group’ by Zhang (2005) suggest that they form a monophyletic clade which derived from an ancestor of Garra.
In most species the upper lip is almost entirely reduced and both the upper and lower jaw margins are keratinised, i.e., horny, and used to scrape food items from the substrate.
Garra differs from other genera within the disc-bearing group in some morphological aspects of the adhesive disc as well as possessing 3, vs. 2, rows of pharyngeal teeth in the throat. The other principle external character is that the first two pectoral-fin rays are usually thickened, fleshy and unbranched in Garra spp. whereas other cyprinids possess only a single unbranched ray.
They’re further distinguished from other Garraina members by the possession of 10-11 dorsal-fin rays plus a combination of internal characters. Interestingly, they lack a stomach with the oesophagus connecting directly to the intestine via a specialised sphincter.
- Narayan Rao, C. R., 1920 - Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 9) 6(31): 45-64
Some new species of cyprinoid fish from Mysore.
- Arunachalam, M. and M. Muralidharan, 2008 - Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 56(2): 405-414
Description of a new species of the genus Psilorhynchus (Teleostei: Psilorhynchidae) from a western Ghat stream in southern India.
- Kullander, S. and F. Fang, 2004 - Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 15(3): 257-278
Seven new species of Garra (Cyprinidae: Cyprininae) from the Rakhine Yoma, southern Myanmar.
- Pornsopin, P., G. Unsrisong, S. Kantiyawong, A. Müller-Belecke and G. Hörstgen-Schwark, 2004 - Book of Abstracts, ISBN 3-86004-182-7: 399
Induced Spawning and Early Development of Stonelapping Minnow, Garra cambodgiensis (Tirant, 1883).
- Stiassny, M. L. J. and A. Getahun, 2007 - Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150(1): 41-83
An overview of labeonin relationships and the phylogenetic placement of the Afro-Asian genus Garra Hamilton, 1922 (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), with the description of five new species of Garra from Ethiopia, and a key to all African species.
- Zhang, E., 2005 - Zoological Studies 44(1): 130-143
Phylogenetic relationships of labeonine cyprinids of the disc-bearing group (Pisces: Teleostei).