LOGIN

RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube
GLOSSARY       

SEARCHGLOSSARY

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

PROFILESEARCH

Channa sp. Burmese red rim rainbow

Home Forums Fresh and Brackish Water Fishes Channa sp. Burmese red rim rainbow

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #320638

    Stefan
    Member

    QUOTE (robert @ Jan 13 2011, 08:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    ihi stephan
    its been discussed several times on the snakeheads uk forum.this isnt new news,lol.
    as this is not a newly discovered channa,its been in the trade now nearly two years now.
    and i have never been asked to keep any of this to myself!!!

    Ah I see

    #320639

    robert
    Participant

    i have no idea weather the dna results are complete or not,all i know is what i have been told.
    i will keep all future info to myself.incase it upsets anyone,which isnt intended

    #320640

    Stefan
    Member

    QUOTE (robert @ Jan 13 2011, 08:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    i have no idea weather the dna results are complete or not,all i know is what i have been told.
    i will keep all future info to myself.incase it upsets anyone,which isnt intended

    Oh no I know you meant well; please know that I meant it in a friendly way. I have some personal experience with being told things (the newly described badid e.g.) and if I would’ve told what I knew it would’ve ruined the publication to the point there might not have even been one because I’d have ruined it. Those things are always very sensitive in my experience.

    #320642

    Matt
    Keymaster

    QUOTE (robert @ Jan 13 2011, 07:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    a guy called tom halvorsen used to work at a trop shop near me

    I used to work for Tom when he had a shop in Gateshead so know him very well.

    #320646

    Nora
    Participant

    QUOTE (Stefan @ Jan 13 2011, 08:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    if I would’ve told what I knew it would’ve ruined the publication to the point there might not have even been one

    That is not correct and sounds slightly paranoid.

    #320647

    Stefan
    Member

    I should’ve expressed myself more clearly; I didn’t mean that a journal would reject it, but that some authors might discontinue the work because the results – in the case where they wanted to keep them quiet – are made public.

    #320649

    Nora
    Participant

    QUOTE (Stefan @ Jan 13 2011, 10:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    some authors might discontinue the work because the results – in the case where they wanted to keep them quiet – are made public.
    #320650

    Stefan
    Member

    QUOTE (Nora @ Jan 13 2011, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    I cannot think of too many (actually, basically none) scientists that can afford this kind of luxury – we’re only paid for the work we do because we publish our results. All else sounds more like fiction but not reality, Stefan.
    #320651

    Nora
    Participant

    QUOTE (Stefan @ Jan 13 2011, 11:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    I’d like to read something of yours sometime, if that’s possible?

    Of course – but remember… it’s on fish food, not fish.

    #320652

    Stefan
    Member

    QUOTE (Nora @ Jan 13 2011, 11:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Of course – but remember… it’s on fish food, not fish.
    #320653

    Nora
    Participant

    QUOTE (Stefan @ Jan 13 2011, 11:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    so if you can ever send me something, please.

    Done.

    #320657

    Matt
    Keymaster

    I can understand why some ichthyologists may want to maintain secrecy about a new species for impact factor on publication but yeah if you’ve been given the funding that paper is getting published regardless I’d have thought.

    What is it you do/study Nora?

    Just to maintain thread etiquette….CHANNA!

    #320662

    Nora
    Participant

    QUOTE (Matt @ Jan 14 2011, 01:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    about a new species for impact factor on publication

    That should not have an effect on the impact factor since the paper describing the species has to be cited the one way or the other. And citations in non-scientific publications don’t count for IF…

    #320664

    Matt
    Keymaster

    Good point but that’s assuming all scientists disregard personal kudos.

    #320669

    Stefan
    Member

    “Fish food” Matt? *ducking under the table for cover* I think more like e.g. Daphnia as its own entity regardless of our feeding it

    Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.