Pangio spp.
- This topic has 107 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Ok thanks Thomas.
Bumpy bump…
I translated a fair bit of the thread (good old google lol) and someone suggests that this is pPangio kuhli and the patern variation is result of constant inbreeding
I think the sentimental side of me wants to think they are both just a one in a million natural variation but the logic side of me says “oh dear” and that these fish are indeed the product of some sort of genetic tinkering.
Unfortunately this sort of thing is just getting more and more common and is now part of the hobby whether we like it or not, at the end of the day profits rule. I think if work isn’t done to ease the pressure on natural stocks this is all we are going to be left with and it will force the majority of us purists out of the hobby
QUOTE (Matt @ Sep 15 2010, 12:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Am planning to work on a few Pangio species profiles next.” border=”0″ alt=”smile.gif” /> First thing is we could do with a few more images. Here are the species we DO have pics for:</p>
<p><i>P. anguillaris<br />P. cuneovirgata<br />P. doriae<br />P. kuhlii<br />P. piperata<br />P. shelfordii</i></p>
<p>Can anyone help with images of other species, particularly <i>P. myersi</i>?<!--QuoteEnd--></div>
<p><!--QuoteEEnd--></p>
<p>Hi Matt</p>
<p>Do you still need any references? From your comments I’m assuming you’ve seen the original kuhlii drawing from Java?</p>
</div><!-- .bbp-reply-content -->
</div><!-- .reply -->
</li><!-- .bbp-body -->
<li class=)
” border=”0″ alt=”smile.gif” /> Am waiting on a couple of papers before adding any more species – I’ve an inkling the ‘real’ <i>P. kuhlii</i> isn’t in the hobby…</p>
</div><!-- .bbp-reply-content -->
</div><!-- .reply -->
<div id=)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
