Topic: Pangio spp. — Seriously Fish

Pangio spp.

This topic has 107 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by Matt.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 143 total)

← 1 2 3 … 8 9 10 →

Author

Posts
February 22, 2011 at 11:24 am #341288

Matt
Keymaster

Haven’t made any changes yet as this is still confusing me! Thomas was there any reason you labelled this one ‘cf.’ oblonga on your site? If so how, for you, does it differ from ‘normal’ P. oblonga?

Will add a profile for the laterally-striped P. anguillaris-group fish this afternoon. We have no idea where it’s imported from right? Then there’s Wolfram’s fish…
February 22, 2011 at 5:59 pm #341291

Thomas
Participant

QUOTE (Matt @ Feb 22 2011, 12:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thomas was there any reason you labelled this one ‘cf.’ oblonga on your site?

Yes https://www.seriouslyfish.com/forums/index….amp;#entry19561

At this time I don’t knew the different between Nasal tubes and barbels – you remember?
February 22, 2011 at 7:20 pm #341296

Matt
Keymaster

Ok I’m unofficially ‘synonymising’ it with the P. oblonga profile then.
February 25, 2011 at 4:50 pm #341376

Matt
Keymaster

Ok changes made.

The sp. ‘PAN02’ profile now looks like this, and the laterally-striped fish is listed as sp. ‘PAN05’.

March 17, 2011 at 11:47 am #341791

wasserscheu
Participant

Matt, I am afraid I forgott to mention the small size of my PAN02, sorry about that. Got a chance to measur it yesterday TL= 4,3cm (snout to end of caudal fin).

When I put the fotos up, I was not sure about it’s size, as it only shows a few times a year.
The striped PAN05 has average lenght, like some Oblonga, just thiner. Those also show hardly never. The myersi- and oblonga type, in the same tank grow fairly large and don’t live as hiden.

Thanks for the new profiles.

March 17, 2011 at 1:53 pm #341796

Matt
Keymaster

No, thank you for your help Wolfram. 🙂 I’ve edited the sizes of the two ‘species’ you mention.

September 24, 2011 at 2:50 pm #345403

The.Dark.One
Participant

I bought a lovely 9cm long P. doriae (probably – couldnt see close enough to check if it had cheek scales) and mixed in with 5 small tanks of these fish I spotted a 4cm long P. cuneovirgata! I love finding contaminants!

May 31, 2012 at 12:02 pm #312848

Matt
Keymaster

Any ideas about this one?

May 31, 2012 at 4:36 pm #312846

Thomas
Participant

Really nice, I wouldn’t throw it out of my tanks 🙂

Couldn’t help you Matt, sorry.

June 6, 2012 at 9:54 am #312567

Matt
Keymaster

No probs Thomas, was worth a try!

January 31, 2013 at 4:43 pm #350057

Matt
Keymaster

@Thomas , do you think the last fish posted is worthy of its own profile page?

Got these two new pics. The first is labelled aberrant P. semicincta and second P. elongata. Any opinions?

January 31, 2013 at 7:29 pm #350059

Thomas
Participant

@Thomas , do you think the last fish posted is worthy of its own profile page?

Yes Matt.

The first looks really aberrant!

February 1, 2013 at 6:59 pm #350063

Matt
Keymaster

Aberrant enough not to be included in the P. semicincta profile? 😛

February 3, 2013 at 8:50 pm #350069

Thomas
Participant

Aberrant enough for a new “Pangio mystery corner” 😉

Ok, the bars on the head could fit, and the dark blotch in the caudale looks rudimentary as the rest of the patterning. The Nasal tubes fits also, so I wouldn’t exclude that this is an aberrant colored Pangio semicincta.

Here you can compare Nonns aberrant and normal semicincta. http://www.siamensis.org/webboard/topic/7863

February 4, 2013 at 10:41 am #350074

Matt
Keymaster

Ok, into the mystery corner it goes!
Author

Posts