R. dorsinotata is poorly-documented in the aquarium literature and we're unsure if it's been exported for the hobby.
It can be told apart from similar-looking species by the following characters: dorsal-fin with a black tip; a black lateral stripe extending from the opercle to posterior half of caudal peduncle, ending in a rounded spot which does not extend onto the caudal-fin; lateral stripe wider anterior to dorsal-fin origin; 26+1-2 lateral line scales; 4½ scales between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin.
Rainboth's 'Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong' characterised members of Rasbora by: possession of an unbranched, non-spiny first dorsal-fin ray; seven soft dorsal rays; origin of the dorsal-fin in the middle of the body; five branched anal-fin rays; a small mouth not extending below the eye; absence of barbels.
It's long been recognised as a polyphyletic lineage as noted by Kottelat (1999) among others, and in 2010 the results of a phylogenetic analysis by Liao et al. suggested a number of changes in order to improve the taxonomy.
The authors found species of rasborin genera to represent a monophyletic grouping existing in six clades and erected four new genera containing former members of Rasbora in order to preserve monophyly of the existing groups.
The first two of these clades contain new groupings Kottelatia and Brevibora, respectively. The third comprises Boraras, Horadandia, Rasboroides, and Trigonostigma, plus new genera Trigonopoma and Rasbosoma.
However the results for Boraras and Trigonostigma were found to be inconclusive in some respects and further work regarding their phylogenetic position was recommended.
The fourth clade includes Rasbora semilineata, R. borapetensis, R. rubrodorsalis, and an undescribed fish similar to R. beauforti. Clade five consists of R. daniconius, R. hubbsi, R. paucisqualis, R. wilpita (plus allies), R. kobonensis, R. ornata, and R. cf. daniconius.
Clade six is subdivided into two groupings. The first contains R. einthovenii, R. elegans, and R. cephalotaenia, and the second R. lateristriata, R. argyrotaenia, R. volzii, R. paviana, R. rasbora (plus an undescribed related fish), R. caudimaculata, and R. trilineata.
As this final clade contains R. cephalotaenia, the type species of Rasbora, its members retain the generic name as do members of clade five because they don't differ sufficiently to warrant erection of a new genus or genera.
Unfortunately many species weren't included in the analysis leading to confusion regarding the correct placement of the 40 or so other Rasbora species, in particular.
As the genus had previously been split into various 'species groups' (groups of closely-related taxa) dating back to Brittan (1972, who referred to them as 'species complexes') Liao et al. proposed the following arrangement whilst noting it may be subject to change in the future:
R. semilineata species group: R. semilineata, R. borapetensis, R. rubrodorsalis.
R. trifasciata species group: R. trifasciata, R. amplistriga, R. bankanensis, R. dies, R. ennealepis, R. hubbsi, R. johannae, R. meinkeni, R. paucisqualis, R. rutteni, R. sarawakensis, R. taytayensis, R. tobana, R. tuberculata.
R. daniconius species group: R. daniconius, R. caverii, R. kobonensis, R. labiosa, R. ornata, R. wilpita.
R. einthovenii species group: R. einthovenii, R. cephalotaenia, R. elegans, R. jacobsoni, R. kalochroma, R. kottelati, R. nematotaenia, R. tubbi.
R. argyrotaenia species group: R. argyrotaenia, R. aprotaenia, R. aurotaenia, R. baliensis, R. borneensis, R. bunguranensis, R. dusonensis, R. evereti, R. hobelmani, R. hossi, R. lateristriata, R. laticlavia, R. leptosoma, R. philippina, R. septentrionalis, R. spilotaenia, R. steineri, R. tawarensis, R. tornieri, R. volzii.
R. sumatrana species group: R. sumatrana, R. atridorsalis, R. calliura, R. caudimaculata, R. dorsinotata, R. notura, R. paviana, R. rasbora, R. subtilis, R. trilineata, R. vulgaris.
Not classified: R. beauforti, R. chrysotaenia, R. gerlachi (validity in question), R. kalbarensis, R. reticulata, R. vulcanus (possibly members of a different, unnamed, genus) and R. zanzibarensis (identity in question).
Shortly afterwards a paper investigating systematics of the subfamily Danioninae was published (Tang et al. 2010).
The results differed significantly and the four new genera of Liao et al., plus Boraras and Trigonostigma, were synonymised with Rasbora based on an incomplete knowledge of relationships within the group, an approach described as 'more conservative'.
Though neither conclusion can be deemed 100% the system of Liao et al. is followed here on SF pending future studies, if only because we prefer to retain the familiar generic names Boraras and Trigonostigma. In addition, species described post-2010 are not included in the list above.
Editing needs JavaScript. This is the text as it was last saved.