Seriously Fish
AdminAccount
AdminAccount

Labiobarbus siamensis

(Sauvage, 1881)Formerly Dangila siamensis Sauvage, 1881 · Dangila spilopleura Smith, 1934

Last revised 2026Edit this page

On this page7 sections
Specimen from Thailand.
Specimen from Thailand.Nonn Panitvong/Siamensis.org

Quick factsEdit

Max size
200mm SL8in SL
Aquarium size
not recorded
Temp
not recorded
pH
not recorded
Hardness
not recorded

Difficulty3 of 8 measures

Moderate

How the rating is worked out

Space
large tank
Water
unknown
Temp
unknown
Diet
unknown
Temperament
unknown
Social
needs to be in a group
Compatibility
fine with others

Other demands

Each of these can raise the rating on its own, whatever the measures above say.

Hardiness
unknown

Labiobarbus siamensis is a cyprinid from the Mekong in Laos, Thailand and Cambodia, and the Chao Phraya and Bang Pakong in central Thailand. It inhabits rivers and streams of all sizes and moves into inundated floodplains and forests during the wet season. Wild fish feed on small items including phytoplankton, zooplankton, periphyton and benthic algae. Relatively long maxillary barbels, reaching well beyond the eye, help separate it from congeners.

Etymology

Edit

Labiobarbus: from the generic names Labeo and Barbus.

siamensis: 'from Siam' [Thailand].

Distribution

Edit

Known from the Mekong River system in Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia, plus the Chao Phraya and Bang Pakong watersheds in central Thailand.

Type locality is 'Thailand: Petschaburi [Petchaburi] and Bangkok'.

Inhabits rivers and streams of all sizes, and typically moves into inundated floodplains and forests during the wet season.

Wild fish are known to feed on small items including phytoplankton, zooplankton, periphyton, and benthic algae.

These recommendations come from this profile’s own figures. They contain affiliate links, so we may earn a commission.

Notes

Edit

L. siamensis can be distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: 39-42 scales in the lateral series; shoulder spot usually absent, but sometimes well-defined; body with longitudinal stripes formed by a spot on each scale; dorsal fin with dusky median stripe and no red coloration; caudal fin dusky, sometimes with reddish coloration, but no well-defined stripes; 20-23 circumpeduncular scales; 25-30½ branched dorsal-fin rays; maxillary barbels relatively long, extending well beyond posterior border of eye.

In recent studies the genus Labiobarbus is usually grouped within the cyprinid subfamily Labeoninae. Several authors including Roberts (1989) have argued that the generic name Dangila (Valenciennes, 1842), which was officially used for over 100 years, should continue to take precedence.

However according to rules set out in the modern-day International Code of Zoological Nomenclature Labiobarbus is the correct name on the basis of priority, having first been proposed by van Hasselt in 1823. Further doubts that van Hasselt and Valenciennes may have described two different fish were settled by Roberts (1993) who found that they were the same.

Members are most-easily distinguished from their close relatives by the possession of two pairs of well-developed barbels, an extremely long dorsal-fin with 4 simple and 18-30 branched rays and unique soft mouth parts which lack unculi (these form ridge-like rows on the lips of other Labeonins).

References

  1. Roberts, T. R. (1993). Systematic revision of the Southeast Asian cyprinid fish genus Labiobarbus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 41(2), 315-329
  2. Kottelat, M. (2013). The fishes of the inland waters of southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibiography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement 27, 1-663
  3. Yang, L. and R. L. Mayden (2010). Phylogenetic relationships, subdivision, and biogeography of the cyprinid tribe Labeonini (sensu Rainboth, 1991) (Teleostei: Cypriniformes), with comments on the implications of lips and associated structures in the labeonin classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54(1), 254-265
  4. Sauvage, H.-E. (1881). Recherches sur la faune ichthyologique de l'Asie et description d'espèces nouvelles de l'Indo-Chine. Nouvelles Archives du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (Série 2) v. 4, 123-194
  5. Kottelat, M. (2001). Fishes of Laos. WHT Publications, Colombo, 1-198