Seriously Fish
AdminAccount
AdminAccount

Hyphessobrycon simulatus

False X-ray Tetra

Géry, 1960

Formerly Pseudopristella simulata Géry, 1960

On this page13 sections
Specimen from the German aquarium trade.
Specimen from the German aquarium trade.Peter & Martin Hoffmann

Quick facts

Length
35mm SL1.4in SL
Tank base
80 × 30cm31 × 12in
Temp
20–28°C68–82°F
pH
5.0–7.0
Hardness
1–10dGH

Difficulty5 of 6 measures

Easy

More bars, more demanding.

Space
modest tank
Water
tap water
Temp
unfussy
Temperament
peaceful
Social
shoal
Compatibility
unknown

This species is uncommon in the aquarium trade although its name is sometimes applied to other species. It was originally described in the monotypic genus Pseudopristella, and can be distinguished from the vaguely similar Pristella maxillaris by possession of a relatively large (vs. relatively small) humeral spot and having black pigmentation in the anal-fin restricted to the first ray (vs. a prominent distal blotch).

Etymology

Hyphessobrycon: from the Ancient Greek υπελάσσων (hyphesson), meaning 'of lesser stature', and used as a prefix in this case, plus the generic name Brycon.

simulatus: from the Latin simulatus, meaning 'imitated', in reference to this species' similarity to the sympatric Pristella maxillaris and an unidentified Hyphessobrycon species.

Distribution

Endemic to French Guiana, where it is known from the Maroni, Mana, Sinnamary, Kourou, Comté, Mahury, Kaw, Approuague and Oyapock/Oiapoque River basins

Type locality is 'Kourou River (coast), French Guiana'.

Habitat

Typically inhabits still and sluggish tributaries and backwaters, including oxbows and floodplain lakes.

Aquarium size

Standard length
35mm SL1.4in SL
Aquarium base
80 × 30cm31 × 12in
Volume
~72litres~19US gal

An aquarium with base dimensions of 80 ∗ 30 cm31 ∗ 12 in or equivalent should be the smallest considered.

Maintenance

Perhaps looks best in an arrangement comprising a sandy substrate plus some driftwood roots and branches although it should also thrive in a planted set-up.

The addition of dried leaf litter would further emphasise the natural feel and as well as offering additional cover for the fish brings with it the growth of microbe colonies as decomposition occurs.

The latter are useful since they provide an additional food source for both adults and fry while the humic substances released by decaying leaves are also considered beneficial.

Water conditions

Temperature
20–28°C68–82°F
pH
5.0–7.0
Hardness
1–10dGH

These boxes carry affiliate links and we may earn a commission. What they recommend comes from each profile’s own figures, never chosen by hand or paid for.

Diet

Likely to be omnivorous feeding on small invertebrates, crustacea, filamentous algae, fallen fruit and suchlike in nature.

In aquaria it may survive on a diet of dried foods but like most fishes does best when offered a varied menu which in this case should also contain live and frozen chironomid larvae (bloodworm), mosquito larvae, Daphnia, Moina, etc.

Behaviour and compatibility

Very peaceful making it an ideal resident of the well-researched community aquarium.

It is perhaps best-maintained alongside similarly-sized characids, gasteropelecids, lebiasinids, smaller callichthyid or loricariid catfishes and non-predatory, small-to-medium-sized cichlids.

Try to buy a mixed-sex group of at least 8-10 specimens, include other schooling fishes to provide security, and you'll be rewarded with a more natural-looking spectacle.

Sexual dimorphism

Sexually mature females are noticeably rounder-bodied and a little larger than males.

Reproduction

Unreported.

Notes

H. simulatus is uncommon in the aquarium trade although its name is sometimes applied to other species.

It was originally described in the monotypic genus Pseudopristella, and can be distinguished from the vaguely similar Pristella maxillaris by possession of a relatively large (vs. relatively small) humeral spot and having black pigmentation in the anal-fin restricted to the first ray (vs. a prominent distal blotch).

Hyphessobrycon was raised by Durbin in Eigenmann (1908) as a subgenus of Hemigrammus, differing from the latter by the absence of scales on the caudal-fin.

The grouping was revised by Eigenmann (1918, 1921) while Géry (1977) created artificial groups of species based on colour pattern, and these definitions are still widely used today, e.g., the H. agulha group, the H. heterohabdus group, etc. These cannot be considered to represent monophyletic assemblages, however, and their concepts continue to be redefined.

Weitzman & Palmer (1997) hypothesised the existence of a monophyletic assemblage within the genus based on colour pattern and male fin morphology that they termed the ‘rosy tetra clade’, with one of the characters supporting its monophyly being presence of a prominent dark marking on the dorsal-fin. This assemblage, plus other morphologically similar species, is considered to represent Hyphessobrycon sensu stricto by some authors, with the remaining species included in a much-expanded H. heterohabdus group.

Others have proposed conflicting, typically more restricted, views of both the genus and/or its constituent species groups, and significant confusion remains. What is clear is that, as currently recognised, Hyphessobrycon is a polyphyletic lineage containing several genera.

The process of splitting it up has already started, and Malabarba et al. (2012) revalidated the genus Ectrepopterus Fowler, previously considered a synonym of Hyphessobrycon. They also analysed its relationships within the Characidae in the context of Mirande's (2010) previous work, but included the type species, H. compressus, for the first time in such a study. The results demonstrated that H. compressus is more closely-related to 'rosy tetra' representatives such as H. eques, H. pulchripinnis, and H. socolofi than other members of the genus including H. anisitsi, H. bifasciatus, H. elachys, H. herbertaxelrodi, and H. luetkeni.

References

  1. Géry, J. (1960). Contributions to the study of the characoid fishes, No. 6. New Cheirodontinae from French Guiana. Senckenbergiana Biologica 41(1/2), 15-39
  2. Reis, R. E., S. O. Kullander and C. J. Ferraris, Jr. (eds) (2003). Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. CLOFFSCA. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, i-xi + 1-729
  3. Oliveira, C. A., G. S. Avellino, K. T. Abe, T. C. Mariguela, R. C. Benine, G. Orti, R. P. Vari, and R. M. Corrêa e Castro (2011). Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11(1), 275-300
  4. Géry, J. (1977). Characoids of the World. T.F.H. Publications, Inc., 1-672
  5. Weitzman, S. H. and L. Palmer (1997). A new species of Hyphessobrycon (Teleostei: Characidae) from the Neblina region of Venezuela and Brazil, with comments on the putative `rosy tetra clade'. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 7(3), 209-242
  6. Zarske, A. (2014). Zur Systematik einiger Blutsalmler oder "Rosy Tetras" (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characidae). Vertebrate Zoology 64(2), 139-167
  7. Mirande, J. M. (2010). Phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes): from characters to taxonomy. Neotropical Ichthyology 8(3), 385-568
  8. Malabarba, L. R., V. A. Bertaco, F. R. Carvalho & T. O. Litz. (2012). Revalidation of the genus Ectrepopterus Fowler (Teleostei: Characiformes), with the redescription of its type species, E. uruguayensis. Zootaxa 3204, 47-60

One photograph on file. More would be welcome.

Distribution

Profile completeness22 of 24

92% complete

Missing: community suitability, water condition notes.